From São Paulo to Rio Homes of Brazil's Wealthiest

  These findings appear to indicate that a supply shift is unlikely to fully explain the increase in female share. It's extremely important to consider two things when interpreting these results, you know? First, the vibes are all about how the positive sign can flex on promoting already lit public servants to boss positions while also demonstrating that they're still on the same contract, ya feel me? This could have a positive effect if we believe that women are more likely to hype up other women. Second, this is a completely different group of workers, not as cool as managers with temporary jobs. It's as if women still enjoy being a part of female-led governments, but it's not strong enough to justify their decision to change jobs or leave once they're on the job. One way or another, the small non-significant magnitude of the estimates is like, low-key saying that even if there's a small supply effect, it's not really the main thing making things happen, ya know?

Public Sector Spec Mech. 

OMG, in this section, I'm evaluating whether various public sector-specific mechanisms could completely drive the increase in the proportion of female managers. Do you know? My analysis is that it is more than just strategic behavior or the provision of public goods, you know? It's much more complex than that. Differences in strategic behaviors. Next, I'll see if strategic can demonstrate these results. It has already been proven, for example, for a small subset of the data in this study, that women hire fewer temporary workers overall because they are less interested in strategic issues ([19]). If male mayors hire more temporary managers due to big brain moves, and these managers are more likely to be dudes, the results make sense. Finally, I'm looking to see if female managers have fewer total temporary managerial workers on table 1.5, and if this potential reduction in total temporary manager workers leads to an increase in the share of female workers. Do you feel me? I've noticed that female-led governments have about 7.13 extra temporary managers per 10,000 people. To be honest, it's kind of lit. One way to demonstrate this with [19] is that, while female mayors may have fewer total temporary workers, they employ more total temporary managers. I don't think strategic behavior is going to cut it when it comes to explaining why there are so many female temporary managers, you know? Differences in Pub Goods Provision. Another public sector-specific mechanism of interest is the increase in demand for areas of public goods provision that are predominantly female. There's plenty of evidence that men and women behave differently as policymakers, particularly when it comes to ensuring that the public gets what they need. For example, women policymakers are significantly associated with improved educational ([31]) and health outcomes ([15], [19]. If you do that, women will hire more people in these areas, and those people will be far more likely to be female; if local governments increase the supply of public goods in these areas, there may be a higher demand for female workers, even as managers. Sorry, family, but we don't watch the managerial worker scene. I do, however, observe the vibes of other public sector workers. If female mayors are truly flexing their muscles by hiring more managers in these areas, you can expect to see an impact not only on managers but also on other employees. 

I'm going to watch this channel next.

Table 1.11 shows how a lit female win affects the worker share in areas where previous lit has demonstrated that a women's victory has a significant impact: education and healthcare. Columns 1 and 2 show the vibes on the share of workers in this area, respectively. Do you know what the total number of workers was at the end of the first year of government? Columns 3 and 4 perform the same function, but for the log of the total number of workers. To be honest, the coefficients are completely out of whack and negative, which means that, while previous studies have shown that having female mayors leads to better public services, it does not necessarily imply that there will be more people working in those fields. As a result, as with other aspects of the public sector, differences in public service delivery are unlikely to explain the rise in female managerial composition, ya know? This article completely breaks down the lack of female power in high-level positions. Women are completely underrepresented in top public sector positions in Brazil, as they are in most other countries around the world. It's not cool, you know? OMG, this is the first study that has made random changes in leadership and discovered that it significantly reduces the gender gap in top positions. So lit! I received receipts indicating that having a female mayor in a tight election increases the number of female managers by 17%. Yas, queen! This result is extremely robust, as if it passed all of the fake tests and so on. To be honest, the vibes from the female share have the potential to affect the entire top quintile of the public sector distribution. I'm going to show you that there's no evidence that closing the gender gap is affecting the quality of managers. A close female W produces managers who are as woke as those in a close male W.

I'm lowkey proving that supply-side vibes aren't the main reason for the results, 'cause loyal public servants don't really want to flex and do more work for female-led government, you know? 

I also believe that this result is extremely unlikely to be explained by gender-specific mayoral vibes or increases in demand for managers in sectors where women are significantly overrepresented. Instead, there's a demand-side preference channel in which a female mayor demands more female managers because she's all about the homophilic vibe, you know? And my data fully supports it. These findings also suggest that sector-specific supply constraints may reduce the leaders' influence, ya know? These findings have significant implications for the issue of girls being completely underrepresented in top positions. First, to the more than 50% of countries where women are completely underrepresented in public sector boss positions, it's as if we should totally boost girl power by using quotas or something or elections, may inadvertently highlight the gender composition gap. Second, the findings suggest that these gains in equality do not come at the expense of quality standards. Third, in the private sector, policies that promote female leadership, such as gender board quotas or policies that support female entrepreneurs, could have a positive impact on top executives. Finally, the findings show that, despite these positive spillovers, policymakers should not abandon policies that target sectors where women are underrepresented, as supply constraints can limit leaders' impact. Yasss, the results show that even when good things happen, we must continue to advocate for women in sectors where they are underrepresented.Because, you know, there are boundaries that can hold leaders back.